<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The CH-147 Chinook: Canada&#8217;s &#8220;Future&#8221; Medium-Lift Helicopter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cdnmilitary.ca/index.php?feed=rss2&#038;p=15" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cdnmilitary.ca/?p=15</link>
	<description>military information and discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 07:39:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Reuter</title>
		<link>http://www.cdnmilitary.ca/?p=15&#038;cpage=1#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>J Reuter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdnmilitary.ca/?p=15#comment-277</guid>
		<description>The Chinook is not &quot;a slow-moving, large target for enemy anti-aircraft fire. To mitigate this problem as best possible, the Americans, for example, use attack helicopters to provide escort&quot;.  The attack helicopters are often left far behind and the Chinook must orbit and wait for them.  It also can operate at higher altitudes and heavy weight.  It is suprisingly agile as well.  While large, it is hardly ungainly and survives a lot of damage from small arms.   Ask the crews before making critical judgements about a platform you obviously have not observed first hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Chinook is not &#8220;a slow-moving, large target for enemy anti-aircraft fire. To mitigate this problem as best possible, the Americans, for example, use attack helicopters to provide escort&#8221;.  The attack helicopters are often left far behind and the Chinook must orbit and wait for them.  It also can operate at higher altitudes and heavy weight.  It is suprisingly agile as well.  While large, it is hardly ungainly and survives a lot of damage from small arms.   Ask the crews before making critical judgements about a platform you obviously have not observed first hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.cdnmilitary.ca/?p=15&#038;cpage=1#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 09:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdnmilitary.ca/?p=15#comment-253</guid>
		<description>Agreed. The only question is when will the contract for the F models get signed? Sure we have 6 D models coming into the CF next month (or February), but they&#039;re only meant as a stop-gap measure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. The only question is when will the contract for the F models get signed? Sure we have 6 D models coming into the CF next month (or February), but they&#8217;re only meant as a stop-gap measure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Lister</title>
		<link>http://www.cdnmilitary.ca/?p=15&#038;cpage=1#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Lister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 01:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdnmilitary.ca/?p=15#comment-252</guid>
		<description>About time the CH147 returns, this aircraft will be a greate assesset to the men and woman of the C.A.F. perhapes even saveing there valuable lives by keeping them out of harms way. 
 I worked on them back in late 70&#039;s and they were inpressive then, the new stronger and more powerfull ones will be even more inpressive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About time the CH147 returns, this aircraft will be a greate assesset to the men and woman of the C.A.F. perhapes even saveing there valuable lives by keeping them out of harms way.<br />
 I worked on them back in late 70&#8242;s and they were inpressive then, the new stronger and more powerfull ones will be even more inpressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cdnmilitary.ca &#187; budget 2008: national defence/sovereignty highlights</title>
		<link>http://www.cdnmilitary.ca/?p=15&#038;cpage=1#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>cdnmilitary.ca &#187; budget 2008: national defence/sovereignty highlights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 03:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdnmilitary.ca/?p=15#comment-229</guid>
		<description>[...] to spending billions of dollars on new equipment for the Canadian Forces. Those commitments include medium-lift helicopters; CC-177 Globemaster III strategic airlifters; new Hercules tactical airlifters; new medium-lift [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to spending billions of dollars on new equipment for the Canadian Forces. Those commitments include medium-lift helicopters; CC-177 Globemaster III strategic airlifters; new Hercules tactical airlifters; new medium-lift [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
